Good Vibrations
Like all politicians, scientists lie to us every day. When their lips are moving, they are probably telling a lie. They all know the Big Bang Theory is a lie, but they continue to preach it anyway. They all know that Evolution doesn’t exist but they continue to lie about that one too. Lie number one in Evolution is that life somehow and accidentally was created out of non-living materials. Can’t happen folks. Never has, at least not on its own. If it did it would still be happening all the time. After all, there is still plenty of inanimate non-living material around. Still plenty of ocean water. Still plenty of lightning. But their theory is that it started accidently one time billions of years ago and then just quit happening. Sure it did. They can’t point to any proof of evolutionary steps in the fossil record when there should be uncounted numbers of fossils showing a step by step progression. But there are none. So, my point is they lie even about the basics.
So, let’s now look at what else they lie about. Remember Einstein’s great theory E=MC2? How do we know that this equation is even close to being right? Maybe it’s really E=MC1.5 or E=MC3. I mean there’s no way to really prove the exactness of this equation other than just taking his word for it. Now let’s look at the equation itself. E is energy. And what this equation is saying is that everything on both sides of the equal marks is the same. So basically, everything is energy. On both sides of the equation is nothing but energy. OK, I might give him that, but it depends on what you mean by the word energy. And what does the “M” stand for anyway? Mass, you say? What is mass? Maybe we can break it all down and see if we can understand what’s being said here. And remember, I’m no scientist or mathematician. So, I’m going to keep it about as simple as I can.
In quantum physics, it has been determined that the presence of an observer makes a difference as to the outcome or nature of the observed. For instance, if you were trying to observe the nature of light there are tests you can set up that are fairly simple in doing so. But what they have discovered is that when you observe the test, light seems to behave as a wave, and when you don’t observe it, light seems to behave as a particle. So, the results are determined not only by the presence of an observer but by what the observer expects to see. Back there in the very beginning of scientific questioning, they weren’t aware of this fact. And when they started thinking about reality, one of them came up with this theory that all material things were made from tiny particles called atoms that were so small they couldn’t be seen. But they were made out of solid material for the most part with these little moons of electrical particles flying around the massive (note that massive here means having measurable weight) inner core. Kind of like a little miniature solar system. They set up tests to prove or disprove this theory and, voila, those tests seemed to confirm that these little mind constructs of the un-seeable were reality. They came up with the whole periodic table and patted themselves on the back for fathoming one of nature’s deep mysteries. But where they correct, or only seeing evidence of what they wanted to see. Later on, when they started “smashing atoms” they discovered that even these particles were made up of even smaller particles and some of those were really strange. Then quantum theory came along and started saying hold up. We can’t even guarantee that any of this stuff is solid. It all seems to be energy or vibrations. And the weird thing is, it seems to pop in and out of existence so frequently and fast that we can never pinpoint the exact location of any of it at any given moment.
So, basically what they are saying is that everything really is just energized vibrations of the ether and only seems to really exist in the presence of an observer. Woa! Did you get that? So, matter isn’t real. And if it’s not a real thing, then the whole underpinnings of our “science” is wrong based on imagination and nothing more.
Now let’s take another part of our famous equation. C squared where C is the speed of light. We’ve all been told that this speed is approximately 186,000 miles/second. I’d like to see the radar gun they measured that with. And furthermore, they say that it takes light 8 minutes to get from the sun to the Earth. But what exactly are we measuring? A particle moving through space? Or a wave propagating like a ripple on a pond? And didn’t Einstein say that if it were possible for an observer to be riding on that light for him there would be no motion through space? And that light going the speed of well…light…would simply see either the universe shrink down to a singularity, or the light itself would be spread out all over the entire universe at once. And the observer would also be everywhere at once so would detect no movement at all. So, if light can’t be said to be moving at any speed at all, then what the heck are we talking about when we say C squared?
From what I’m gathering from quantum physics these days, they seem to be saying that light (and everything else for that matter) is just a spontaneous, energetic vibration of the ether. And light cannot be said to be traveling from the Sun to the Earth at all. It does not radiate from its source. Instead when our star came into existence, it vibrated the ether in all directions to infinity at once. If this is true, it changes the whole picture we have of the universe and all that stuff about red-shifts and expanding universes is bogus.
The Bible says that God spoke the universe into existence. And he looked and said it was good. Speaking is sound and sound is defined as vibration. So, the universe as we know it, is basically how our own collective minds wish to interpret the good vibrations God spoke into existence. Our minds and imaginations can come up with all sorts of strange things and they might seem very real to us. Our senses are easily tricked into believing that there is a reality out there that is solid and would exist even without us or God. But it is becoming more and more clear that it is all an elaborate, (and as Einstein himself pointed out) persistent illusion.
So why do scientists lie to us or mislead us constantly about all this? There are many reasons, but the bottom line is they want to keep the status quo as it is. They want a materialistic and godless universe because they don’t want to be held accountable to or by any superior being. And if you watch them closely, many of them strut around with a smug superiority like they themselves wish to be thought of as our gods. Some, however, have begun showing cracks in their armor. Encouragingly, a few have simply relented and come over to the other side of good vibrations.